GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI’s GPT-6.1 Sol model for coding and agentic work, with published results from both Artificial Analysis and Vals AI.
Where it stands
Rank compares tracked models with a score. Published shows the source’s rank and field size, when available.
| Benchmark | Score | Rank | Published | Leader | Behind |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vals IndexVals AI | 61.15% | 8of 33 | 8of 41 | Gemini 4 Argon | 7.75 pts |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis | 52 | 6of 42 | no list read | Claude Opus 5.5 | 6 pts |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Artificial Analysis | 56.06% | 5of 40 | no list read | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 7.58 pts |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1Vals AI | 88.93% | 7of 38 | 7of 106 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 3.46 pts |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1Artificial Analysis | 58.10% | 3of 24 | no list read | GPT-6 Astra | 5.23 pts |
| MLCR-AAArtificial Analysis | 33.89% | 13of 37 | no list read | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 41.11 pts |
| AutomationBench-AAArtificial Analysis | 64.87% | 8of 40 | no list read | Gemini 4 Argon | 12.64 pts |
| SciCodeArtificial Analysis | 54.17% | 27of 40 | no list read | Claude Opus 5.5 | 12.73 pts |
| GDP.pdfArtificial Analysis | 31.00% | 1of 40 | no list read | GPT-6.1 Sol | — |
| CritPtArtificial Analysis | 31.71% | 2of 42 | no list read | GPT-5.6 Sol | 0.58 pts |
| AA-OmniscienceArtificial Analysis | 41.53 | 6of 42 | no list read | Claude Opus 5.5 | 4.89 |
| AA-LCR v1.1Artificial Analysis | 83.00% | 12of 42 | no list read | Kimi K3 | 5.67 pts |
| ProofBench v1.1Vals AI | 99.00% | 4of 34 | 5of 46 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 1.00 pts |
| Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkVals AI | 5.42% | 23of 37 | 29of 73 | Muse Spark 1.2 | 20.00 pts |
| MysteryMechanismVals AI | 46.40% | 5of 21 | 5of 21 | GPT-6 Astra | 6.75 pts |
| BioMysteryBenchVals AI | 79.63% | 2of 19 | 2of 21 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 1.48 pts |
| Code MigrationVals AI | 65.12% | 5of 37 | 5of 71 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 4.71 pts |
| CyberBench v1.1Vals AI | 39.29% | 30of 31 | 41of 43 | GPT-6 Sol | 38.69 pts |
| EMBVals AI | 70.77% | 12of 37 | 12of 69 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 5.90 pts |
| Finance Agent (v2)Vals AI | 52.03% | 26of 37 | 31of 73 | Gemini 4 Argon | 13.37 pts |
| IOIVals AI | 96.89% | 3of 31 | 3of 38 | Gemini 4 Argon | 3.11 pts |
| Legal Research BenchVals AI | 38.46% | 26of 37 | 28of 72 | Muse Spark 1.3 Max | 16.83 pts |
| MedCodeVals AI | 48.84% | 15of 35 | 26of 104 | Claude Opus 5 | 14.73 pts |
| MedScribeVals AI | 86.45% | 18of 36 | 21of 106 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 4.98 pts |
| Public Benefits Bench v1.1Vals AI | 59.34% | 25of 29 | 31of 45 | Claude Opus 5 | 17.59 pts |
| SAGEVals AI | 46.54% | 20of 32 | 35of 90 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 9.56 pts |
| SRE BenchVals AI | 50.76% | 2of 15 | 2of 16 | GPT-6 Astra | 6.11 pts |
| Tax Agent BenchVals AI | 62.31% | 23of 37 | 27of 64 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 15.33 pts |
| GDPval-AA v2.1Artificial Analysis | 1,575.09 | 21of 42 | no list read | Claude Opus 5.5 | 271.08 |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1Artificial Analysis | 1,564.21 | 11of 41 | no list read | Claude Opus 5.5 | 257.64 |
| Humanity's Last ExamArtificial Analysis | 52.92% | 8of 42 | no list read | Claude Opus 5.5 | 8.43 pts |
Nearby on Vals Index
The two models above and below on the Vals Index (Vals AI), on every column where this model has a published number.
| Model | Vals Index | Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index | Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Vibe Code Bench v1.1 | Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | 63.13% | 53 | 59.09% | 89.59% | 63.33% |
| Claude Fable 5Anthropic | 61.39% | 50 | 42.42% | 90.35% | – |
| GPT-6.1 SolOpenAI | 61.15% | 52 | 56.06% | 88.93% | 58.10% |
| Muse Spark 1.3 MaxMeta | 58.16% | 48 | 33.33% | 85.86% | 10.95% |
| GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI | 58.01% | 47 | 39.90% | 80.50% | 22.38% |
Cost and speed, as published
Additional measurements from Artificial Analysis’ own row. Read 30 September 2026.
| As published | Cost per task | Output speed |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-6.1 Sol (max) | $0.72 | 69.3 tok/s |
Results by benchmark
Independent and vendor results retain their own harnesses and effort settings.
| Benchmark | Independent run | As reported by a publisher |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.1 (offline strict pass)Computer use | no published result | 39.8%OSWorld 2.1 (offline strict pass)Anthropic · 7 October 2026Rank 3 of 6 in this publisher table |
| MLCR-AAMedical reasoning | 33.89%Artificial Analysis | not published |
| AutomationBench-AAWorkflow automation | 64.87%Artificial Analysis | not published |
| SciCodeScientific coding | 54.17%Artificial Analysis | not published |
| GDP.pdfDocument reasoning | 31.00%Artificial Analysis | not published |
| CritPtScientific reasoning | 31.71%Artificial Analysis | not published |
| AA-OmniscienceFactual knowledge | 41.53Artificial Analysis | not published |
| AA-LCR v1.1Long-context reasoning | 83.00%Artificial Analysis | not published |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Agentic coding | 56.06%Artificial Analysis 55.05%Vals AI | 58.2%Terminal-Bench 4.0Anthropic · 7 October 2026Rank 3 of 6 in this publisher table |
| MMMU ProMultimodal reasoning | 85.95%Artificial Analysis | not published |
| Vibe Code Bench v1.1Product coding | 88.93%Vals AI | not published |
| Terminal-Bench Science 0.1Agentic science | 58.10%Artificial Analysis | 57.0%Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1Anthropic · 7 October 2026Rank 3 of 5 in this publisher table 57.0%Terminal-Bench Science 0.1OpenAI · 29 September 2026Rank 3 of 4 in this publisher table |
| ProofBench v1.1Mathematics | 99.00%Vals AI | not published |
| Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkProfessional knowledge | 5.42%Vals AI | not published |
| MysteryMechanismScientific reasoning | 46.40%Vals AI | not published |
| Vals IndexComposite | 61.15%Vals AI | not published |
| BioMysteryBenchAgentic science | 79.63%Vals AI | not published |
| Code MigrationAgentic coding | 65.12%Vals AI | not published |
| CyberBench v1.1Security | 39.29%Vals AI | not published |
| EMBFinancial modelling | 70.77%Vals AI | not published |
| Finance Agent (v2)Financial analysis | 52.03%Vals AI | not published |
| IOICompetitive programming | 96.89%Vals AI | not published |
| Legal Research BenchProfessional knowledge | 38.46%Vals AI | not published |
| MedCodeHealthcare administration | 48.84%Vals AI | not published |
| MedScribeHealthcare administration | 86.45%Vals AI | not published |
| Public Benefits Bench v1.1Public services | 59.34%Vals AI | not published |
| SAGEEducation | 46.54%Vals AI | not published |
| SRE BenchSecurity | 50.76%Vals AI | not published |
| Tax Agent BenchProfessional knowledge | 62.31%Vals AI | not published |
| OSWorld 2.0Computer use | no published result | 71.4%OSWorld 2.0 (offline set, partial reward)OpenAI · 29 September 2026Rank 2 of 3 in this publisher table |
| OSWorld 2.1Computer use | no published result | 76.6%OSWorld 2.1 (offline partial)Anthropic · 7 October 2026Rank 3 of 6 in this publisher table |
| AutomationBenchBusiness workflows | no published result | 36.1%AutomationBench 1.0.6OpenAI · 29 September 2026Rank 3 of 5 in this publisher table |
| DeepSWE v1.1Software engineering | no published result | 75.2%DeepSWE v1.1OpenAI · 29 September 2026Rank 1 of 3 in this publisher table |
| GDPval-AA v2.1Knowledge work | 1,575.09Artificial Analysis | not published |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1Knowledge work | 1,564.21Artificial Analysis | not published |
| Humanity's Last ExamMultidisciplinary reasoning | 52.92%Artificial Analysis | not published |
| Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexComposite | 52Artificial Analysis | not published |
Source notes
From the linked sources. Read 30 September 2026.
Token limits and input. 1,050,000 total context tokens; at most 922,000 input tokens and 128,000 output tokens. Text and image input; text output. Audio and video are unsupported. Knowledge cutoff: 30 April 2026.
Reasoning effort. low, medium (default), high, xhigh and max; none and minimal are unsupported.
Tool calling. Use the Responses API for tools. Chat Completions supports requests without tools. Streaming and structured outputs are supported; fine-tuning is unavailable.
Standard prices / Mtok. $2 input, $0.10 cached input, $2.50 cache writes and $10 output.
Long prompts. With more than 272,000 input tokens, the full request costs $4 input, $0.20 cached input, $5 cache writes and $15 output per Mtok.
Processing modes. Fast costs twice Standard; Batch and Flex cost half. Regional processing adds 10%. US and EU data residency are supported; Fast is unavailable in the EU.
Sources
Read on 17 October 2026.
- OpenAI announcementopenai.com/index/introducing-gpt-6-1-sol/
- OpenAI API model pagedevelopers.openai.com/api/docs/models/gpt-6.1-sol
- OpenAI API pricingdevelopers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing
- OpenAI GPT-6 guidedevelopers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/latest-model
- Artificial Analysis Sol (max) model pageartificialanalysis.ai/models/gpt-6-1-sol
- Artificial Analysis Sol (max) provider measurementsartificialanalysis.ai/models/gpt-6-1-sol/providers
- Vals AI model pagewww.vals.ai/models/openai_gpt-6.1-sol