Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
An index over a fixed suite of reasoning, coding, mathematics and agentic evaluations, reported on its own scale rather than as a percentage.
How it is run
Artificial Analysis runs each model on its own harness at several reasoning-effort settings and publishes the highest-effort result it measured, named in the table. Version 4.3.2 of the index adds AutomationBench-AA, moves Terminal-Bench to 4.0 and drops τ³-Banking; cost per task is measured on the same harness.
What it cannot tell you
A composite over one publisher's suite, so it says nothing about Vals AI's suite and cannot be averaged with the Vals Index: their task mix, weights and harnesses differ. The number also depends on which effort setting was published, and a single component can move the index.
- Leader
- Claude Opus 5.558 · among the models on this site
- Top-ten spread
- 10Leader minus tenth place, or last place in smaller fields.
- Median
- 42of the 42 models on this site
- No published result
- 4of 46 models on this site
No top list to rank
Artificial Analysis scores 492 models on this benchmark but publishes no ordered list for them, so this site ranks only the 42 models it holds a number for and claims nothing beyond that.
Models tracked on this site
All 42 models this site has a published number for. Ranks are among these models only, within the 492 models measured by Artificial Analysis.
| # here | Model | Index |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 58 |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 56 |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.1 | 53 |
| 3 | Gemini 4 Argon | 53 |
| 3 | GPT-6 Astra | 53 |
| 6 | GPT-6.1 Sol | 52 |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5 | 51 |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5 | 50 |
| 9 | GPT-6 Sol | 48 |
| 9 | Muse Spark 1.3 Max | 48 |
| 11 | GPT-5.6 Sol | 47 |
| 12 | Grok 4.7 | 46 |
| 12 | MiMo V2.6 Pro | 46 |
| 14 | GLM 5.3 | 45 |
| 14 | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | 45 |
| 16 | Grok 4.6 | 44 |
| 16 | Kimi K3 | 44 |
| 16 | Step 5 Preview | 44 |
| 19 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 43 |
| 20 | Claude Opus 4.8 | 42 |
| 20 | GLM 5.3 Flash | 42 |
| 20 | GPT-5.6 Terra | 42 |
| 23 | Claude Opus 4.7 | 41 |
| 23 | Gemini 3.8 Flash | 41 |
| 25 | Muse Spark 1.2 | 40 |
| 25 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 40 |
| 25 | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | 40 |
| 25 | Qwen3.8 Max | 40 |
| 29 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 39 |
| 29 | Gemini 3.7 Flash | 39 |
| 29 | GPT-5.4 | 39 |
| 29 | Grok 4.5 | 39 |
| 33 | Claude Sonnet 5 | 38 |
| 33 | GPT-5.5 | 38 |
| 33 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 38 |
| 36 | GPT-5.6 Luna | 37 |
| 36 | GPT-6 Luna | 37 |
| 38 | DeepSeek V4 Pro | 36 |
| 39 | Gemini 3.1 Pro | 30 |
| 40 | MiniMax M3 | 29 |
| 41 | Inkling | 25 |
| 42 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | 14 |
No published result tracked
4 of the 46 models on this site have no published number on this benchmark, so their cells in the home table stay blank rather than reading as zero.
Read this with
Benchmarks in the same category, which usually disagree with this one on purpose.
Sources
Every page used for this benchmark, read on 17 October 2026.
- Benchmark site or the page that publishes itartificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models
- Independent resultsartificialanalysis.ai/leaderboards/models