AIEvals

Benchmarks

SkillsBench

Whether an agent uses packaged tools and skills effectively, scored both with and without the skill library available.

Agentic toolingVals AI35 models run by Vals AIUpdated 27 September 2026

How it is run

Reports two numbers per model, which makes the difference between them the interesting quantity.

What it cannot tell you

A model that scores well with skills and poorly without them is measuring the skill library as much as the model.

Leader
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash69.80% · Vals AI's own list
Top-ten spread
10.61%Leader minus tenth place, or last place in smaller fields.
Median
52.74%of the 35 rows published
No published result
26of 46 models on this site

Independent leaderboard · Vals AI

Top 35 of 35 runs by Vals AI, one harness.

#ModelScore
1DeepSeek V4.1 Flash69.80%
2Grok 4.566.03%
3Gemini 3.7 Flash65.89%
4Gpt 5.5 Codex62.56%
5GPT-5.562.21%
6Claude Fable 5.161.55%
7GPT-5.6 Luna60.45%
8Claude Opus 560.44%
9Claude Opus 4.859.23%
10Muse Spark 1 159.19%
11GPT-5.6 Terra58.90%
12Gemini 3.8 Flash57.99%
13Grok 4.655.77%
14Qwen3.7 Plus54.30%
15GPT-5.6 Sol54.10%
16DeepSeek V4 Pro53.83%
17Muse Spark 1.253.04%
18Gemini 3.5 Flash52.74%
19Gpt 5.4 2026 03 0551.71%
20MiniMax M351.50%
21Deepseek V4 Pro51.27%
22Deepseek V4 Flash 073150.67%
23Kimi K2.7 Code50.04%
24Claude Sonnet 4 649.05%
25GLM 5.347.51%
26Claude Sonnet 546.48%
27Glm 5.245.08%
28Qwen3.8 Max42.01%
29Grok 4.340.64%
30GLM 5.3 Flash40.16%
31Qwen3.8 27b38.11%
32Inkling Small33.58%
33Ling 3.0 Flash 260727.95%
34Inkling26.09%
35Mercury 2.518.06%

No published result tracked

26 of the 46 models on this site have no published number on this benchmark, so their cells in the home table stay blank rather than reading as zero.

Read this with

Benchmarks in the same category, which usually disagree with this one on purpose.

Sources

Every page used for this benchmark, read on 17 October 2026.