Anthropic
Claude Haiku 5.5: system card capability evaluations · 7 October 2026
| Rank | Model | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | 49.9% |
| 4 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | 6.4% |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 70.0% |
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | 72.3% |
Ranks compare reported scores in the same published row; ties share a rank.
WANDR (frozen index). Figure 8.8.3.A labelled max soft-F1 scores. Haiku low/medium/high/xhigh: 3.5/12.9/37.3/45.9%. Frozen search index, Opus 4.6 judge, 980k task budget.
Section 8, pages 111–139 of the Haiku 5.5 system card, read 8 October 2026. Values come from exact prose, tables and labelled figures. Unless specified, Haiku uses adaptive thinking at max effort and five trials with evaluation-specific context up to 1M. Each row retains its subset, metric, effort and source notes; no score is assigned to an unspecified SWE-Bench Pro version. Terminal runs use safeguards without fallback and no internet egress. ProgramBench uses filtered tasks and hidden-test pass rate without a time limit. OSWorld partial and strict results use the official 82-task offline subset. CAD uses 0–1 voxel IoU. Healthcare raw and length-adjusted scores stay separate. Life-science results disable Haiku biology safeguards. Independently run figures quoted by Anthropic remain publisher reports here. Missing comparison values are not inferred from rounded charts.